East Carolina
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
889  Austin Miller JR 33:42
1,465  Jakub Trzasalski SR 34:28
1,808  Corey Hampshire SR 34:59
1,988  William Cline SO 35:18
2,269  Adam Morrow JR 35:52
2,723  Justin Lane FR 37:10
2,781  Clifford Buck FR 37:24
2,796  Abel Tecle FR 37:29
2,946  Dylan Traywick SO 38:20
National Rank #205 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #29 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Austin Miller Jakub Trzasalski Corey Hampshire William Cline Adam Morrow Justin Lane Clifford Buck Abel Tecle Dylan Traywick
Pirate Collegiate Invitational 09/27 1279 34:07 34:12 35:18 35:12 36:12 36:43 37:12 36:14
Lehigh Paul Short Run 10/05 1245 33:17 34:33 34:58 35:03 36:40 35:28 37:26 38:14 39:05
Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/19 1304 34:05 34:40 34:55 35:05 37:31
Conference USA Championships 11/02 1261 33:37 34:20 34:59 35:57 35:07 38:16 37:09





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 28.9 872 0.0 0.1 2.2 10.1 16.0 16.7 16.3 15.5 12.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Austin Miller 103.8
Jakub Trzasalski 150.5
Corey Hampshire 180.5
William Cline 199.8
Adam Morrow 225.1
Justin Lane 260.9
Clifford Buck 267.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 0.0% 0.0 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 2.2% 2.2 25
26 10.1% 10.1 26
27 16.0% 16.0 27
28 16.7% 16.7 28
29 16.3% 16.3 29
30 15.5% 15.5 30
31 12.2% 12.2 31
32 6.7% 6.7 32
33 3.0% 3.0 33
34 0.9% 0.9 34
35 0.3% 0.3 35
36 0.1% 0.1 36
37 0.0% 0.0 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0